Mythos-class · Back online worldwide since July 1, 2026

Claude Fable5: Anthropic's first Mythos-class AI model

The independent guide to Claude Fable5 — verified specs, honest benchmark readings, real pricing math, and prompting strategies. Every fact dated and sourced.

Compare Fable 5 vs all major models

80.3%
SWE-Bench Pro — the highest public-model score
1M
token context window, up to 128K output
$10 / $50
per million input / output tokens
<5%
of sessions routed to Opus 4.8 safeguards

Generate a Claude Fable5 system prompt

Configure task type, autonomy, and output style — get an optimized Claude Fable5 system prompt built on Anthropic's official guide, right here.

Open the full generator page
Prompt language

Task type

Pick the category that best matches your task — it sets the agent's role

6

XML blocks

2,401

Characters

686

Est. tokens

Generated prompt

Live
system_prompt.xml
<role_and_goal>
You are an autonomous software engineering agent. Your goal is to complete complex coding tasks end-to-end, self-verifying and correcting along the way.
</role_and_goal>

<task>
(Describe your specific task here)
</task>

<execution_guidelines>
1. Autonomous action: Act when you have sufficient information. For reversible operations within the original request scope, proceed directly without asking. Only pause and ask the user for irreversible/destructive operations, genuine scope changes, or when user input is truly required.
2. Avoid over-engineering: Do not add features, refactoring, or abstractions beyond what the task requires. Do the simplest effective thing. Do not design for hypothetical future needs.
3. Evidence-driven: Before reporting progress, audit every claim against actual tool execution results from this session. Report successes and failures honestly. If a test fails, include the output; if a step was skipped, explain why.
</execution_guidelines>

<communication_style>
1. Output style: Be results-oriented. The first sentence after completing a task should answer 'what happened' or 'what you found'—what the user would want to know if they said 'just give me the TLDR.' Supporting details and reasoning come after.
2. Tone: Maintain a warm, professional tone. Do not make negative assumptions about the user's judgment, while staying objective and avoiding psychoanalysis.
3. Format: Use Markdown formatting, but avoid excessive heading levels. Code must be in appropriate code blocks.
</communication_style>

<memory_system>
During the current task, actively track and record: confirmed working approaches, errors encountered and their solutions, skipped steps and reasons. Include a "Lessons Learned" section in the final report.
</memory_system>

<progress_reporting>
For long-running tasks:
1. After completing each major milestone, use the send_to_user tool (if available) to report progress to the user rather than waiting until the task is fully complete.
2. Before reporting progress, audit every claim against actual tool execution results from this session. Only report work you have evidence for; if something is unverified, say so explicitly.
3. Report results honestly: if a test fails, include the output; if a step was skipped, explain; when something is done and verified, state it plainly without hedging.
</progress_reporting>

API code

Call Claude Fable5 with this prompt via the Anthropic SDK

fable5_task.py
import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic(
    api_key="YOUR_API_KEY",  # or use ANTHROPIC_API_KEY env var
)

SYSTEM_PROMPT = """<role_and_goal>
You are an autonomous software engineering agent. Your goal is to complete complex coding tasks end-to-end, self-verifying and correcting along the way.
</role_and_goal>

<task>
(Describe your specific task here)
</task>

<execution_guidelines>
1. Autonomous action: Act when you have sufficient information. For **reversible operations** within the original request scope, proceed directly without asking. Only pause and ask the user for **irreversible/destructive operations**, genuine scope changes, or when user input is truly required.
2. Avoid over-engineering: Do not add features, refactoring, or abstractions beyond what the task requires. Do the simplest effective thing. Do not design for hypothetical future needs.
3. Evidence-driven: Before reporting progress, audit every claim against actual tool execution results from this session. Report successes and failures honestly. If a test fails, include the output; if a step was skipped, explain why.
</execution_guidelines>

<communication_style>
1. Output style: Be results-oriented. The first sentence after completing a task should answer 'what happened' or 'what you found'—what the user would want to know if they said 'just give me the TLDR.' Supporting details and reasoning come after.
2. Tone: Maintain a warm, professional tone. Do not make negative assumptions about the user's judgment, while staying objective and avoiding psychoanalysis.
3. Format: Use Markdown formatting, but avoid excessive heading levels. Code must be in appropriate code blocks.
</communication_style>

<memory_system>
During the current task, actively track and record: confirmed working approaches, errors encountered and their solutions, skipped steps and reasons. Include a "Lessons Learned" section in the final report.
</memory_system>

<progress_reporting>
For long-running tasks:
1. After completing each major milestone, use the send_to_user tool (if available) to report progress to the user rather than waiting until the task is fully complete.
2. Before reporting progress, audit every claim against actual tool execution results from this session. Only report work you have evidence for; if something is unverified, say so explicitly.
3. Report results honestly: if a test fails, include the output; if a step was skipped, explain; when something is done and verified, state it plainly without hedging.
</progress_reporting>"""

def run_task(user_message: str) -> str:
    """Send a task to Claude Fable5 and return the response."""
    response = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-fable-5",
        max_tokens=16000,
        # The only intelligence/cost dial on Fable 5. temperature, top_p,
        # top_k and fixed thinking budgets all return 400.
        output_config={"effort": "high"},
        system=SYSTEM_PROMPT,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": user_message,
            }
        ],
    )

    # A safety classifier hit is an HTTP 200 answered by Opus 4.8, not an
    # exception — branch on stop_reason or it passes silently.
    if response.stop_reason == "refusal":
        raise RuntimeError(
            f"refused: {getattr(response.stop_details, 'category', None)}"
        )

    text_blocks = [
        block.text
        for block in response.content
        if block.type == "text"
    ]
    return "\n".join(text_blocks)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    result = run_task("Describe your task...")
    print(result)

Install: pip install anthropic

Usage tips

  • Paste the generated prompt into the Claude API `system` parameter
  • Fable5 is an asynchronous agent — the more complete the task description, the better the result
  • Set `output_config: undefined` — it is the only intelligence dial; thinking is always on and cannot be configured

What Claude Fable5 can do

Claude Fable5 is a single Mythos-class model, built for the longest, hardest reasoning and agentic tasks — and still the top published SWE-Bench Pro score among publicly available models.

Software engineering

Claude Fable5 plans, writes, and refactors production code across huge repositories — 80.3% on SWE-Bench Pro, still the highest score Anthropic has published for a publicly available model.

Long-horizon autonomy

Claude Fable5 stays focused across millions of tokens and improves its own work by keeping notes — give it file memory and it runs tasks for days, not turns.

Vision & UI understanding

Claude Fable5 reads precise figures out of dense scientific charts and rebuilds a working web app from a single screenshot — no helper tools required.

Knowledge work

Claude Fable5 brings expert-level judgment to dense documents: document reasoning, chart interpretation, and problem solving at the top of financial benchmarks.

Scientific research

Accelerates literature review, hypothesis generation, and analysis across demanding scientific domains.

Advanced reasoning

Mythos-class analytical depth for the hardest professional tasks — complex analysis where detail and judgment both matter.

Stripe reported that Claude Fable5 completed a full migration of a 50-million-line Ruby codebase in one day — work originally scoped for a team over two months.
Early-access result
Given file-based memory, Claude Fable5's performance in the card game Slay the Spire jumped sharply — note-taking is how it sustains multi-day tasks.
Early-access result

Benchmarks — with the honest footnote

Anthropic's published results put Claude Fable5 ahead on agentic coding and knowledge work. Here's the full table, and the caveat the launch posts bury.

BenchmarkClaude Fable5 / Mythos 5Opus 4.8GPT-5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-Bench Pro (coding)80.3%69.2%58.6%54.2%
FrontierCode (Diamond)29.3%13.4%5.7%
GDPval-AA (knowledge work)1932189017691314
GDP.pdf (vision, no tools)29.8%22.5%24.9%16.7%
OSWorld-Verified (computer use)85.0%83.4%78.7%76.2%

On cybersecurity and biology evaluations (e.g. ExploitBench), Claude Fable5's safeguards cap its scores near Opus 4.8 — the published top scores there belong to the unrestricted Claude Mythos 5. Source: Anthropic announcement, June 9, 2026.

Full benchmark breakdown & honest read →

Safety

One model, two releases

Anthropic split the release: Claude Fable5 is the safeguarded model anyone can use; Mythos 5 is the same weights with safeguards lifted, reserved for vetted defenders.

Public

Claude Fable5

Generally available with strict safety classifiers. On sensitive topics like cybersecurity and biology, fewer than 5% of sessions are quietly answered by Claude Opus 4.8 instead of being refused.

Restricted

Claude Mythos 5

The same underlying model with safeguards lifted in some areas — available only to a small group of vetted cyberdefenders and infrastructure providers through Project Glasswing.

Both models carry a 30-day data-retention policy for safety monitoring — zero-data-retention terms do not apply.

Claude Fable5 pricing, in real numbers

Claude Fable5 costs $10 in, $50 out per million tokens — double Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 5, which both list at $5/$25. Use the calculator to see what that means for your workload.

Input

$10

per million tokens

Output

$50

per million tokens

Prompt caching cuts cached input tokens by 90% — long system prompts and specs get dramatically cheaper on repeat calls.

Context window
1M tokens
Max output
128K tokens
Thinking
Adaptive only — temperature / top_p removed
Tier
Mythos-class — priced a tier above Opus

Monthly cost calculator

Estimate a month of usage and compare across the current Claude lineup.

ModelAPI price (in / out)Estimated monthly costvs Claude Fable5
Claude Fable5$10 / $50$1,000
Claude Opus 4.8$5 / $25$500$-500
Claude Sonnet 5$2 / $10$200$-800
Claude Sonnet 4.6$3 / $15$300$-700
Claude Haiku 4.5$1 / $5$100$-900

Claude Sonnet 5 uses its introductory rate of $2 / $10 per million tokens (through August 31, 2026; standard $3 / $15 after). All current models — Sonnet 5, Fable 5 and Opus 5 — share the tokenizer introduced with Opus 4.7, so the figures below compare on equal terms. Only estimates carried over from Opus 4.6 or earlier need a ~30% upward adjustment.

Where Claude Fable5 is available

Every official channel and its real-time status — Fable 5 returned globally on July 1, 2026 after the June 12 US export-control suspension, redeployed with updated safety classifiers.

Update — July 1, 2026: Claude Fable 5 is available again worldwide. Some routine coding and debugging requests temporarily fall back to Opus 4.8 while Anthropic tunes the new safety classifiers to reduce false positives.

  • Claude API

    Model ID claude-fable-5 — available again as of July 1, 2026 at $10 / $50 per M tokens

    Live
  • Claude apps

    Back on Pro, Max, Team, and select Enterprise — Max/Team Premium include up to 50% of weekly limits (permanent from July 20); Pro/Team Standard typically via usage credits

    Included
  • AWS · Google Cloud · Microsoft Foundry

    Redeployed globally — available again on AWS Bedrock, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Foundry

    Live
  • GitHub Copilot

    Live again — Fable 5 is selectable in GitHub Copilot

    Live
  • OpenRouter

    Live as anthropic/claude-fable-5 — calls resolve now that the suspension is lifted

    Live

You never need a third-party reseller. Be cautious of anyone selling Claude Fable5 access keys outside these official channels.

When to use Claude Fable5 — and when not to

Choose by task value. The same well-structured prompt ports across the whole Claude lineup, so start cheap and escalate to Claude Fable5 only when quality demands it.

Claude Fable5

$10 / $50

Reach for Claude Fable5 on the longest autonomous runs, and where its peak CursorBench score is worth double the price: large refactors, multi-day agents, expert analysis where mistakes are expensive.

Claude Opus 5

$5 / $25

The daily driver since July 24, 2026. Half of Claude Fable5's price, ahead on most published benchmarks, and the default model on Claude Max.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

$3 / $15

Balances speed and intelligence for production workloads at scale.

Claude Haiku 4.5

$1 / $5

Fast, simple tasks: classification, extraction, light chat.

Prompting Claude Fable5

Four habits that matter more on Claude Fable5 than on any previous Claude.

  1. Be literal

    Claude Fable5 follows instructions more literally than older models: state the role, one line of context, the task, the output format, and hard constraints.

  2. Spec first

    For long agentic tasks, put the full specification in the first message instead of drip-feeding it across turns.

  3. No sampling knobs

    temperature and top_p are gone — when you want variation, ask for it explicitly in the prompt.

  4. Tune effort, not temperature

    The effort parameter (low to max) trades analytical depth against speed and cost. Most work runs fine below max.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about Claude Fable5 — updated July 2, 2026.

Build on Claude Fable5 with your eyes open

Know the Claude Fable5 cost math, the safeguard behavior, and the right tier before you commit. Create a free account to get notified when specs, prices, or access channels change.